| |
Team
Decision-Making - Guards Against Groupthink
Teams
need not fall victim to "Groupthink." By being aware of
the potential for groupthink and taking precautions against it,
better team decision-making can be ensured. Some of the techniques
for countering groupthink are:
- Leadership
- Team leaders, facilitators, and mentors need to: refrain from
expressing their personal preferences to the team, elicit open
discussion, and encourage the free expression of diverse points
of view, objections, or concerns. The value of differing opinions
should be encouraged to the point of fostering constructive conflict
within the team, so that all perspectives can be brought to the
fore.
- Devil's
Advocate - One or more members should be assigned to
be a devil's advocate to challenge assumptions, alternatives,
and decisions.
- Reversed
Roles - A member who opposes a particular alternative
can be asked to argue in favor or it and vice versa.
- Expert
Opinion - Experts from outside the group can be called
in to express different points of view.
- Decision
Criteria - Objective criteria, including weighting factors
where appropriate, should be developed for evaluating alternatives.
- Structured
Rankings - Likewise, an objective form of ranking alternatives
to support decision-making needs to be used. Consider individual
and anonymous rankings, at least at the beginning of the process,
to reduce undue influence or ranking/voting by other members.
- Second
Chance Meeting - A "second chance" meeting
can be held after the decision has been made. The purpose of this
meeting is to permit each member to reconsider the whole issue
and voice any residual concerns before the decision is made final.*
* Daut,
Kathryn "Groupthink--The Dark Side of Teaming and How to Counteract
It!," U.S. Air Force, Air War College, Leadership, Ethics,
& Command Central, Communication Skills, Mediation and Facilitation.
|
|