| |
Why
Use Teams?
Some
teams have had spectacular success in improving quality, increasing
productivity, and adding to the profitability of their organizations.
Examples are:
- Private
Sector Team Results*
- Shenandoah
Life Insurance reduced case handling from 27 to 2 days.
- Proctor
& Gamble lowered manufacturing costs 30% - 40%.
- General
Electric increased productivity 250%.
- Xerox
experienced 30% higher productivity.
- Rubbermaid
developed a new product line that resulted in sales 50% greater
than expected.
- Honeywell
increased quality from 82% to 99.5% and output by 280%.
- American
Transtech cut processing time and costs by 50%.
-
U.S. Government Team Results (OPM)
- U.S.
Army, ARDEC reduced Technical Data Package (TDP) preparation
time from over 190 days to less than 30 days (500% improvement);
errors were reduced from 33% to less than 1%.
- U.S.
Food and Drug Administration, (FDA), Baltimore District Office,
Microbiology Lab, cut testing time for food and drug samples
50%.
- U.S.
Treasury Department, IRS Brookhaven Service Center, NY, increased
caseload productivity 20% and decreased overdue receipts 15%
to 20%.
- Fort
Hood revamped a waste disposal/environmental program, resulting
in $3.5 million in savings and cost avoidance.
There
are many other examples from both industry and government on the
usefulness of teams. To make dramatic change, teams do not have
to be large. A team that revolutionized the Burlington Northern
Railroad consisted of 7 members; the team that turned around Knight-Ridder
newspapers had fourteen.**
* Swenson,
D., College of St. Scholastica, Duluth MN, "Teams--the good,
the bad, and the ugly."
** Katzenbach,
J.R., Smith, D.K., The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance
Organization, Harper Business, 1993.
|
|